(Continuing with the long running and often tortured series about the "Principles of Talentism". Hang in there, we're almost done.)
If you are in a P&L that
delivers services then you need to learn how to be a consultant. In fact,
spending time as a consultant is something that everybody in corporate America should
do at least once in their career.
We need to separate the practice of consulting from it’s standard implementation. Consultants usually exist inside of consultancies, and consultancies, like all other businesses, exist to make money. Since consultancies make their money by finding things that are wrong and pointing them out to a client who may be otherwise blissfully unaware of the issue, consultancies are structurally doomed to be reviled by their clients and the clients employees. The fact that many consultancies make money by finding things that are perfectly OK, or could be repaired by someone internally, and then pointing them out to the client as not only broken, but only fixable by the consultancy themselves, further tarnishes the luster of the profession.
But we are not talking about the business of consulting here. So let’s acknowledge
that “consultants” get a bad name for reasons both real and imagined and talk
about what being a consultant is all about.
Good consultants do three things very well: ask insightful questions to
gain deeper understanding, listen for opportunity and identify the real
problem. By comparison, most business people spend time primarily as
accountants: count the problems and cost them.
Whenever I see a reasonably successful business person they always have the consultant qualities. Whenever I see someone that is locked in a dead-end job, watching the clock and hoping for a cold beer and TV as soon as possible, they operate by the principles of accounting. I have never seen a variation to this theme.
Everyone in the organization has to take responsibility for asking the
right questions to figure out what everyone else is talking about. This is a
consulting skill.
The second part of the consultant’s skill set is “listening for opportunity.” The little accountant inside of you wants to keep score. So someone comes to you with a problem and your brain kicks in with the double-entry accounting: “Bob messed this up and it’s gonna cost him a lot to get me to dig him out from it.” Like all double-entry accounting, however, this never achieves anything except a zero-basis. Remember, accounting, whether it is classical number crunching or internal defensive mind games, is all about making the ledger balance. Creating value goes out the window.
How do you know “the real problem”? Start by asking the WGLL question –
“What does good look like?” Get people out of their purely analytical stance
and ask them to start exploring the problem from the perspective of goodness
(otherwise known as “quality”). Once they have identified the ultimate goal in
a way that is real and compelling, ask them to describe how solving this
problem connects to the larger business goals at hand. This is critical because
while there are many problems to be solved within a company, only a few
problems are actually impediments to achieving the stated goals of the company.
Most problems are just accounting (the personal ledger is out of balance). Once
the person has described WGLL and how it solves a problem important to the
company, then ask them to draw a straight line between the activity they are proposing
and getting to WGLL on that problem. It usually can’t be done. This is how
asking questions helps you get to the “real problem.”
HR can take the lead in transforming the corporate culture from
accounting to consulting. It’s a key part of the strategy of getting the
maximum leverage from your talent, and it’s a unique insight that only HR can
bring to the table and foster through training, advocacy and communication.

I am relieved to see that Mr. Hunter has started writing again. The world was missing his intelligent voice!
Posted by: Wendy Morgan | August 04, 2006 at 12:37 PM