It seems
everyone is happy that blogs are finally proving to be worth something. Cursed
with a long(er) memory, I remember a debate that we had on this site about
measuring value. Perhaps we were Nero and the market was burning. Regardless, it
seems to me that there are two relevant questions to ask ourselves:
- Do you
believe that JobCentral and Jobster are run by idiots? If so, then you can
write their profligate ways off to “Bubble 2.0.” If not, then it is apparent
that blogs have value.
- How did
these buyers measure the value of their transactions? Assuming this wasn’t a
drug-fueled 60’s flashback that ended in outrageous outlays of cash and stock,
how did the buyers rationally decide that they would get more than they paid
for?
And what about
those diehards who believe that the measuring of value is a distraction to the
creation of that value? Well, I guess the market thinks differently. I for one
will blog out of love, but it’s nice to know that somebody, somewhere could be
thinking about the value of my site. Labor of love or investment in big money
opportunity? Tastes great or less filing? I think we have entered the “Miller
Lite” era of blogging.
PS – To
continue the beer analogy, we eventually get the big guys who just care about
packaging and distribution, and the micros that lay claim to “quality.” Will
Joel Cheesman be the next king of beers? Will I end up drunk on Fat Tire? Only
time will tell…

Sounds like the progression from my 20s to my 30s: Going from thinking I was a King of Beers to just ending up with a 'fat tire' around my gut.
Posted by: Joel | June 14, 2006 at 06:05 AM
the plight of the common man
.o0.
Posted by: Jeremy Langhans | June 20, 2006 at 06:28 AM
Your customer is not "just" and lot of people think they are. Which is the reason they can't see these intangible wants of customers. This doesn't hold true for beer seller only. Quality has, indeed, become the day to day fundamental.
Posted by: John | February 26, 2007 at 05:02 AM